Diplomatic terms formed by specific words in Kazakh and Turkish languages


Views: 70 / PDF downloads: 50

Authors

  • G.A. Begimova
  • K.K. Kenzhalin

Keywords:

terminological element, definition of a term, Turkish terms, semantics, lexical meaning.

Abstract

. This article discusses the formation of specific diplomatic terms between the Kazakh and Turkish
languages, and also shows their relevance at the present time. The work analyzes the semantics and lexical
composition of diplomatic terms in Kazakh and Turkish languages. It is known that today the phenomenon of
globalization is accelerating the integration process in all fields of science. It is important to define the terms of
the modern Turkic languages that have arisen from linguistic integrity and established their own characteristics,
to show their closeness and specificity, to determine their place in science. Since diplomatic terms are a common
problem in many areas, they will no doubt help to understand the basis of this phenomenon. In the field of
terminology, a comparison of diplomatic terms in Turkish and Kazakh can lead to the development of new
scientific views and new findings. Because, defining general terms in the Turkic languages, we focus on
identifying the main difficulties in communication between diplomats and business people.
The study of diplomatic terms of the Kazakh and Turkish languages is an important and urgent issue in
terminology. In connection with changes in diplomatic science, it is necessary to increase the number of common
diplomatic terms in order to strengthen cooperation between Turkic languages. The creation of a common base
of terms will contribute to the further fruitful development of diplomatic relations between Kazakhstan and
Turkey.

Published

03.12.2020

How to Cite

Begimova Г. ., & Kenzhalin Қ. . (2020). Diplomatic terms formed by specific words in Kazakh and Turkish languages. Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Political Science. Regional Studies. Oriental Studies. Turkology Series., 133(4), 30–35. Retrieved from https://bulpolit.enu.kz/index.php/main/article/view/527

Issue

Section

Political Sciences