National identity politics and state consolidation in Latvia and Estonia since independence
Views: 0
Keywords:
national identity, nation-state, memory politics, Latvia, EstoniaAbstract
This article explores how Latvia and Estonia have addressed significant challenges related to forming national identity, consolidating their states, and distancing themselves from the Soviet legacy since regaining independence. The objective of the study is to analyze the key factors that have influenced nation-building in both countries, with a focus on language policy, memory politics, and the integration of Russian-speaking minorities. The research is qualitative in nature and draws upon academic literature, legal documents, statistical data, and policy reports. It incorporates elements of discourse analysis, historical comparison, and case-based examinations of political and cultural transformations. The findings indicate that the restoration of Latvian and Estonian statehood necessitated not only political and economic restructuring but also a reevaluation of cultural and linguistic foundations that were weakened during the Soviet era. The analysis reveals that citizenship laws, minority integration frameworks, and language reforms were pivotal in redefining national identity. Additionally, memory politics played a crucial role; interpretations of World War II, the removal of Soviet monuments, and disputes over historical narratives significantly influenced public discourse and state policies. The study highlights that, although Russian-speaking minorities initially faced exclusion, gradual policy adjustments and European integration have helped alleviate tensions. Nevertheless, Russia's geopolitical actions – including the annexation of Crimea and the full-scale invasion of Ukraine – have notably hastened the Baltic states' efforts to diminish Russian influence. This study emphasizes how small states with complex ethnolinguistic landscapes can effectively consolidate their nationhood. The experiences of Latvia and Estonia offer a valuable comparative model for understanding post-Soviet state-building, the politics of memory, and the challenges of managing historical legacies while integrating into European structures.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Political Science. Regional Studies. Oriental Studies. Turkology Series.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




